Conversation
📝 WalkthroughWalkthroughAdds Changes
Sequence DiagramsequenceDiagram
participant User
participant Router
participant LayoutRoute
participant LandingPage
participant DownloadsPage
User->>Router: Navigate to / or /downloads
Router->>LayoutRoute: Render _view route layout
LayoutRoute->>LayoutRoute: Render sticky Header
alt Navigate to /
LayoutRoute->>LandingPage: Render landing page
LandingPage->>LandingPage: Initialize Typewriter animation
LandingPage->>LandingPage: Render hero section
LandingPage->>LandingPage: Render features section
LandingPage->>LandingPage: Render CTA with DownloadButton
else Navigate to /downloads
LayoutRoute->>DownloadsPage: Render downloads page
DownloadsPage->>DownloadsPage: Render platform cards (macOS, Windows, Linux)
DownloadsPage->>User: Display download links
end
LayoutRoute->>LayoutRoute: Render Footer
LayoutRoute->>User: Display complete page
Estimated code review effort🎯 3 (Moderate) | ⏱️ ~25 minutes The changes span multiple files with mixed complexity: dependency updates are straightforward, the new downloads route is a simple component, but the landing page redesign ( Possibly related PRs
Suggested reviewers
Pre-merge checks and finishing touches❌ Failed checks (2 warnings, 1 inconclusive)
✨ Finishing touches
🧪 Generate unit tests (beta)
Thanks for using CodeRabbit! It's free for OSS, and your support helps us grow. If you like it, consider giving us a shout-out. Comment |
![coderabbitai[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/347564?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Actionable comments posted: 7
📜 Review details
Configuration used: Path: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro
⛔ Files ignored due to path filters (3)
apps/web/src/routeTree.gen.tsis excluded by!**/*.gen.tspackages/ui/src/components/ui/typewriter.tsxis excluded by!packages/ui/src/components/ui/**pnpm-lock.yamlis excluded by!**/pnpm-lock.yaml
📒 Files selected for processing (6)
apps/web/package.json(1 hunks)apps/web/src/routes/_view/downloads.tsx(1 hunks)apps/web/src/routes/_view/index.tsx(2 hunks)apps/web/src/routes/_view/route.tsx(1 hunks)packages/ui/package.json(1 hunks)packages/ui/tailwind.config.ts(0 hunks)
💤 Files with no reviewable changes (1)
- packages/ui/tailwind.config.ts
🧰 Additional context used
🧬 Code graph analysis (2)
apps/web/src/routes/_view/downloads.tsx (2)
apps/web/src/routes/_view/index.tsx (1)
Route(8-10)apps/web/src/routes/_view/route.tsx (1)
Route(3-5)
apps/web/src/routes/_view/index.tsx (2)
apps/web/src/routes/_view/downloads.tsx (1)
Route(3-5)packages/utils/src/cn.ts (1)
cn(20-22)
🪛 Biome (2.1.2)
apps/web/src/routes/_view/index.tsx
[error] 40-40: Avoid using target="_blank" without rel="noopener" or rel="noreferrer".
Opening external links in new tabs without rel="noopener" is a security risk. See the explanation for more details.
Safe fix: Add the rel="noopener" attribute.
(lint/security/noBlankTarget)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
apps/web/package.json (1)
13-13: LGTM!The workspace dependency addition aligns with the UI component usage in the landing page redesign.
apps/web/src/routes/_view/index.tsx (1)
22-28: Verify Typewriter component usage and animation configuration.The Typewriter component is used with specific timing parameters. Ensure the component handles the array cycling correctly and that the animation doesn't interfere with the page load performance.
The implementation looks good, but please verify:
- The Typewriter component properly cycles through all three phrases
- The animation doesn't cause layout shifts or flashing on initial render
- The component is accessible (screen readers handle it appropriately)
packages/ui/package.json (1)
43-45: Both animation libraries are actively used—confirm if consolidation is desired.The codebase uses both
framer-motionandmotion:
framer-motion(line 43): Used intypewriter.tsxfor simple motion animationsmotion(line 45): Used inprogressive-blur.tsxandtext-animate.tsxviamotion/reactimports for more complex animationsBoth packages serve actual purposes in the code, so this is not a case of unused dependencies. However, the dual-library approach does introduce complexity. If consolidating to a single animation library is feasible, that would reduce bundle size and maintenance overhead. Verify whether this architectural split is intentional or if migrating components to use a single library would be beneficial.
2 participants
No description provided.